Improving Efficiency in Vehicle Rental Operations
Authors
Karazhekov Denys

Share
Annotation
Vehicle rental operators lose a measurable fraction of scheduled fleet availability to unscheduled idle time that existing telemetry platforms cannot isolate from legitimate downtime, because they classify vehicle state from ignition and GPS signals without cross-referencing dispatch schedule and maintenance records. This paper introduces a closed-loop operational efficiency framework comprising a five-state activity taxonomy, a weighted composite Utilization Rate Index, FFT-based structural pattern detection over a 90-day rolling horizon, and priority-ranked prescriptive interventions with demand-adaptive threshold adjustment. Evaluated on a 30-vehicle fleet over 60 operational days and validated on a 42-vehicle fleet over 90 days, the framework reduces the unscheduled idle fraction of scheduled availability from 18.7% to 11.3%, raises fleet-mean shift-level URI from 0.681 to 0.743, and achieves pattern detection precision of 96.2% in zones with demand coefficient of variation below 0.40. A critical weighting boundary at w₂ = 0.22 defines the operating limit above which redeployment recommendations are fully suppressed by the priority function, and a 29% attribution error rate under dual-signal temporal overlap conditions establishes the binding constraint on intervention specificity.
Keywords
Authors
Karazhekov Denys

Share
References:
Firouz, M., Li, L., & Keskin, B. B. (2022). Managing equipment rentals: Unreliable fleet, impatient customers, and finite commitment capacity. Production and Operations Management, 31(11), 3963–3981. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13796
Gans, N., & Savin, S. (2007). Pricing and capacity rationing for rentals with uncertain durations. Management Science, 53(3), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0651
Golalikhani, M., Oliveira, B. B., Carravilla, M. A., Oliveira, J. F., & Antunes, A. P. (2021). Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149, Article 102280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102280
Guillen, J., Ruiz, P., Dellepiane, U., Maccarrone, L., Maccioni, R., Pinzuti, A., & Procacci, E. (2019). Europcar integrates forecasting, simulation, and optimization techniques in a capacity and revenue management system. INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, 49(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2018.0970
Illgen, S., & Höck, M. (2019). Literature review of the vehicle relocation problem in one-way car sharing networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 120, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.12.006
Klein, R., Koch, S., Steinhardt, C., & Strauss, A. K. (2020). A review of revenue management: Recent generalizations and advances in industry applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 284(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.034
Li, D., & Pang, Z. (2017). Dynamic booking control for car rental revenue management: A decomposition approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.044
Oliveira, B. B., Carravilla, M. A., & Oliveira, J. F. (2017). Fleet and revenue management in car rental companies: A literature review and an integrated conceptual framework. Omega, 71, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.011
Oliveira, B. B., Carravilla, M. A., Oliveira, J. F., & Costa, A. M. (2019). A co-evolutionary matheuristic for the car rental capacity-pricing stochastic problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(2), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.015
Savin, S. V., Cohen, M. A., Gans, N., & Katalan, Z. (2005). Capacity management in rental businesses with two customer bases. Operations Research, 53(4), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1040.0193
Xu, M., Meng, Q., & Liu, Z. (2018). Electric vehicle fleet size and trip pricing for one-way carsharing services considering vehicle relocation and personnel assignment. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 111, 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.001
