Academic publishing in Europe and N. America

Archive Publication ethics Submission Payment Contacts
In the original languageTranslation into English

Neuroadaptive Pilot Cabin Interfaces: New Horizons in Aviation Ergonomics

Authors

Alain Philippe Gruchet

Rubric:Technical sciences in general
10
0
Quote
10
0

Annotation

The evolution of cockpit design has historically followed a trajectory from purely mechanical instrumentation toward integrated digital environments and increasingly automated flight management systems. Yet, the cognitive and physiological limitations of pilots remain decisive in shaping aviation safety and efficiency. Neuroadaptive interfaces represent a novel paradigm that integrates real-time monitoring of neural, ocular, and psychophysiological signals into adaptive cockpit systems capable of dynamically adjusting displays, workload distribution, and control modalities. This article explores the emerging horizon of aviation ergonomics where human–machine interaction is redefined through neuroadaptive technologies. By synthesizing findings from cognitive neuroscience, human factors engineering, and applied aviation research, the paper highlights both the promises and challenges of embedding neuroadaptive systems into future cockpits. The discussion underscores technical architectures, adaptive display logic, experimental validation, and ethical implications, while emphasizing the role of these systems in augmenting situational awareness, mitigating fatigue, and preventing human error.

Keywords

neuroadaptive interface; cockpit design; aviation ergonomics; brain–computer interface; adaptive display; cognitive workload; pilot–automation interaction

Authors

Alain Philippe Gruchet

Rubric:Technical sciences in general
10
0

Share

10
0

References:

Baldwin, C. L., & Penaranda, B. N. (2012). Adaptive training using an artificial neural network and EEG metrics for within- and cross-task workload classification. NeuroImage, 59(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.065

Borghini, G., Aricò, P., Di Flumeri, G., Colosimo, A., Bonelli, S., Golfetti, A., & Babiloni, F. (2015). EEG-based cognitive control behaviour assessment: An ecological study with professional air traffic controllers. Scientific Reports, 5, 13730. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13730

Fairclough, S. H., & Lotte, F. (2020). Grand challenges for physiological computing. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17(5), 051001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aba3d2

Gateau, T., Durantin, G., Lancelot, F., Scannella, S., & Dehais, F. (2015). Real-time state estimation in a flight simulator using fNIRS. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0121279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121279

Jetzek, T., Bender, M., & Helmert, J. R. (2021). Neuroergonomics in aviation: EEG workload assessment during flight simulation. Applied Ergonomics, 94, 103424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103424

Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50\_30392

Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C. D. (2008). Humans: Still vital after all these years of automation. Human Factors, 50(3), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312198

Prinzel, L. J., Freeman, F. G., Scerbo, M. W., Mikulka, P. J., & Pope, A. T. (2003). A closed-loop system for examining psychophysiological measures for adaptive task allocation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327108IJAP1302\_6

Schmidt, E. A., Schrauf, M., Simon, M., Fritzsche, M., Buchner, A., & Kincses, W. E. (2009). Drivers’ misjudgment of vigilance state during prolonged monotonous daytime driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(5), 1087–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.007

Zander, T. O., & Kothe, C. (2011). Towards passive brain–computer interfaces: Applying brain–computer interface technology to human–machine systems in general. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8(2), 025005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005

Sumwalt, R.; Cross, D.; Lessard, D. Examining How Breakdowns in Pilot Monitoring of the Aircraft Flight Path. Int. J. Aviat. Aeronaut. Aerosp. 2015, 2.

Lefrançois, O.; Matton, N.; Causse, M.; Gourinat, Y. The role of Pilots’ monitoring strategies in flight performance. In Proceedings of the 32nd EAAP Conference (European Association for Aviation Psychology), Cascais, Portugal, 26–30 September 2016.

Gateau, T.; Durantin, G.; Lancelot, F.; Scannella, S.; Dehais, F. Real-Time State Estimation in a Flight Simulator Using fNIRS. PLoS ONE 2015, 10.

Van de Merwe, K.; van Dijk, H.; Zon, R. Eye movements as an indicator of situation awareness in a flight simulator experiment. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 2012, 22, 78–95.

Other articles of the issue

Shevchuk Nadiia, Tytova Liudmyla IDENTIFICATION OF NEW BACILLUS VELEZENSIS ENDOPHYTIC STRAINS – PROBIOTIC AGENTS FOR SOYBEAN SYMBIOTIC SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
Download article in PDF348 views
cc-license
About us Journals Books
Publication ethics Terms of use of services Privacy policy
Copyright 2013-2025 Premier Publishing s.r.o.
Praha 8 - Karlín, Lyčkovo nám. 508/7, PSČ 18600, Czech Republic pub@ppublishing.org