Academic publishing in Europe and N. America

Archive Publication ethics Submission Payment Contacts
In the original languageTranslation into English

Educational Ecosystem as an Institutional Construct: Theoretical Foundations, Multi-Level Assessment, and Conditions of Sustainability

Authors

Aleksandra Leonteva

Rubric:Pedagogy
2
0
Quote
2
0

Annotation

This article examines the concept of the educational ecosystem as an alternative to the conventional curriculum-centred model of instructional design. Drawing on the principle of constructive alignment (Biggs, 1999), the theory of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998), and the four-level model of learning evaluation (Kirkpatrick, 1959), the article develops an analytical framework that describes the conditions under which an educational environment produces sustainable change in learners’ professional behaviour. The article integrates empirical evidence from recent research published between 2015 and 2025 and includes sections drawing on data obtained within a specific institutional context.

Keywords

educational ecosystem
constructive alignment
communities of practice
Kirkpatrick model
competency transfer
institutional design
assessment of educational outcomes

Authors

Aleksandra Leonteva

References:

World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of Jobs Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/

Gallup and Lumina Foundation. (2021). Lumina-Gallup Education Consumer Study. Gallup.

European Training Foundation (ETF). (2022). Skills Mismatch Measurement in Developing Countries. ETF Publications.

Biggs, J., and Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Hattie, J., and Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1, 16013.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.

Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., and Graham, I. D. (2019). Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice. Implementation Science, 14(1), 1–8.

Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., and Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: A conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(2), 139–160.

Kirkpatrick, J. D., and Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. ATD Press.

Training Industry. (2022). State of Learning Measurement Report. Training Industry, Inc.

European University Association (EUA). (2023). Learning and Teaching Paper Series: Assessment Practices in European Higher Education. EUA Publications.

Thalheimer, W. (2018). The Learning-Transfer Evaluation Model: Sending Messages to Enable Learning Effectiveness. Work-Learning Research.

Hattie, J., and Clarke, S. (2019). Visible Learning: Feedback. Routledge.

Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Surface, E. A., and Olenick, J. (2019). A dynamic model of training transfer. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 270–283.

Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., and Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257.

Nicol, D. J., and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

Ibarra, H., Rattan, A., and Johnston, A. (2020). Satya Nadella at Microsoft: Instilling a growth mindset. Harvard Business School Case 9-420-064. [Cf. also: Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791.]

Edelman. (2024). Edelman Trust Barometer 2024. Edelman.

McKinsey and Company. (2023). Future of Higher Education: How Universities Can Thrive in a Changing World. McKinsey Global Institute.

Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC andU). (2022). High-Impact Practices and Student Outcomes. AAC andU Publications.

Wenger-Trayner, E., and Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledge. Routledge.

Lumina Foundation and OECD. (2023). Measuring What Matters: Outcome Agreements in Professional Education [Connecting Credentials Report]. Lumina Foundation.

Fullan, M., and Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The Right Drivers in Action for Schools, Districts, and Systems. Corwin Press.

Other articles of the issue

Phan Thanh Cong DEVELOPING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY FOR FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENT HEADS OF PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING: CURRENT SITUATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
24 views
cc-license
About us Journals Books
Publication ethics Terms of use of services Privacy policy
Copyright 2013-2025 Premier Publishing s.r.o.
Praha 8 - Karlín, Lyčkovo nám. 508/7, PSČ 18600, Czech Republic pub@ppublishing.org