Academic publishing in Europe and N. America

Archive Publication ethics Submission Payment Contacts
In the original languageTranslation into English

Beyond Disclosure: How Audit Culture Transforms Transparency into Public Trust in Democratic Governance

Authors

Elman Azizov

Rubric:Economics
86
0
Quote
86
0

Annotation

The paper explores how audit culture redefines transparency in democratic governance by transforming oversight into a form of ethical communication. Drawing on contemporary public-sector reforms and the experience of the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services, the study demonstrates that legitimacy grows not from the quantity of information disclosed but from the public’s ability to interpret such information as evidence of fairness. The author argues that audit culture bridges bureaucracy and trust by linking financial accuracy with moral understanding, offering a practical framework for governments seeking to restore confidence through reflective accountability.

Keywords

audit culture
accountability
public trust
democratic governance
ethics in administration
transparency

Authors

Elman Azizov

References:

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2022). Accountability and learning in a digital era: Public management reform revisited.* Public Policy and Administration, 37*(3), 231–247.
de Vries, M. S., & Kim, P. S. (2023). Transparency and trust revisited: Contextualizing open government for the twenty-first century.* International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89*(2), 251–269.
 Edelman Trust Barometer. (2024). Global report: Restoring trust through credible communication. Edelman Insights.
 Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in historical perspective. Public Management Review, 8(3), 479–496.
 Kim, P. S., & de Vries, M. S. (2024). Performance, integrity, and public confidence: Reassessing accountability frameworks.* Public Administration Review, 84*(1), 15–28.
 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Public trust in government: Ethics, accountability and integrity. OECD Publishing.
 Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
 Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for “intelligent accountability.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970.
 Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. Routledge.
 United Nations General Assembly. (1994). Resolution 48/218 B: Establishment of the Office of Internal Oversight Services. United Nations.
 United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS). (2022). Annual report on internal oversight activities. United Nations.
 Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: A five-year national study.* Public Administration Review, 67*(2), 289–303.
 Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance–trust link: Implications for performance measurement.* Public Administration Review, 66*(1), 114–126.

Other articles of the issue

Shahana Mammadova (Kocharli) A Comparative Analysis of Jalil Mammadguluzadeh’s Satirical Feuilleton “Shir and Khurshid” and Anton Chekhov’s Short Story “Anna on the Neck”
66 views
cc-license
About us Journals Books
Publication ethics Terms of use of services Privacy policy
Copyright 2013-2025 Premier Publishing s.r.o.
Praha 8 - Karlín, Lyčkovo nám. 508/7, PSČ 18600, Czech Republic pub@ppublishing.org