Theoretical concepts of public administration and Kosovo case
Authors
Albulena Brestovci, Zemri Elezi
Share
Annotation
The paper gives an insight about the understanding of public administration under Kosovo developments and the practical developments of Kosovo public administration from the post war period until the current times. Author with the paper gives explanations about the concepts of public administration from various authors from both, theorical aspects and form the practical developments of it. For the needs of the paper, the combined methodology is used followed by following methods: method of legal analysis, method of comparison analysis, method of political analysis and method of linguistic analysis. The main aim of the paper is description of understandings of basic concepts and the development of public administration through different phases of its development---from the international civil administration in Kosovo, to Kosovo independence and the new trends of its development in the spirit of EU integrations. Paper is expected to be important component of academic debate in Kosovo which will be further enriched and on the other hand it will serve as a means to be used by practitioners.
Keywords
Authors
Albulena Brestovci, Zemri Elezi
Share
References:
Azizi, A., Aziri, E., & Elezi, Z. (2009). Fjalor shumë dimensional i termave dhe shprehjeve administrative, politike, sociale dhe të diplomacisë. Shkup: Vatra.
Batalli, M. (2011). Impact of Public Administration Innovations of Enhancing the Citizens` Expectations. International Journal of e-Education, e- Bussines, e-Managment and e-Learning , 156-162.
Batalli, M. (2016). Factors Affecting the Transformation of Public Administration . Juridica, 31-43.
Bovaird, T. (2002). Public management and governance. In E. Vigoda, Public Administration, an interdidciplinary critical analysis (pp. 345-376). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Caldwell, L. K. (n.d.). Public Administration- The New Generation. Marcel Dekker, 151-176.
Cheema, S. G. (2007). Linking governments and citizens through democratic governance. ESA, 29.
Clements, K. A. (1998). Woodrow Willson and administrative reforms. Wiley, 320-336.
Counsil of Europe. (2007). Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7. Strasburg: Council of Europe.
Dahl, A. R. (1947). The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems. ASPA, 1-11.
Demir, T. (2009). Politics and Administration: Three Schools, Three Approches, and Three Suggestions. Administrative Theory&Praxis, 503-532.
Farazmand, A. (1996). Development and Comparative Public Administration: Past, Present, and Future . Public Administration Quarterly, 343-364.
Farazmand, A. (2009). Bureaucracy, administration, and politics: An introduction. Taylor&Francis, 1.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). WHY THERE IS NO SCIENCE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. Journal of International Affairs, 189-201.
Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (1937). Papers on the Science of Administration. Institute of Public Administration, 132.
Hughes, E. O. (2012). Public management & administration. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hustendt, T., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (n.d.). Public administration and disciplines. Leuven University Press.
Kettl, D. F. (1999). The future of Public Administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 127-133.
Meier, K. J. (2015). Proverbs and the Evolution of Public Administration. American Society for Public Administration, 15-24.
OECD, SIGMA, & Eoropean Union. (2005, October). Cheklist for general law on administrative procedures. Retrieved from Sigma: http://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/37890936.pdf
Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1971). Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration. ASPA, 203-216.
Pollozhani, B., Dobjani, E., Stavileci, E., & Salihu, L. (2010). E drejta administrative, aspekte krahasuese. Shkup: Tringa .
Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Governments serving people:The Changing Roles of Public Administration in democratic governance. 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government (pp. 1-28). Vienna, Austria : United Nations.
Rosenbloom, D. (1983). Public Administrative Theory and the Separation of Powers. ASPAI, 219-227.
Spicer, M. (2004). Public Administration, the history of Ideas, and the Reinventing Government Movement. American Society for Public Administration, 353-362.
Storing, H. J. (1965). Leonard D. White and the study of Public Administration. ASPA, 38-51.
Terry, L. D., & Spicer, M. W. (1993). Legitimacy, History, and Logic: Public Administration and the Constitution. American Society for Public Administration, 239-246.
Thornhill, C., & Dijk, G. (2010). Public administration theory: Justification for conceptualisation. Journal of Public Administration, 95-110.
Thornhill, C., & Dijk, G. v. (2010). Public Administration Theory: Justification for Conceptualisation. Journal of Public Administration, 95-110.
Vigoda, E. (2002). The legacy of Public Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker, INC.
Waldo, D. (1988). Review: The End of Public Administration? ASPA, 929-932.
Wright, B. E. (2011). Public Administration as an Interdiscipinary Field: Assesing Its Relationship with the Fields of Law. American Society for Public Administration, 96-101.
Other articles of the issue
