Academic publishing in Europe and N. America

Archive Publication ethics Submission Payment Contacts
In the original languageTranslation into English

CONTEXT, SPEECH ACTS AND STRATEGIC MEANING AS ELEMETS OF PRAGMATIC ARCHITECTURE OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Authors

Gunay Tahmazova

Rubric:General questions of philology and linguistics
1
0
Quote
1
0

Annotation

This article examines political discourse as a strategically organized form of communication in which linguistic meaning is inseparable from context, speaker intention, audience interpretation and social purpose. Rather than treating linguopragmatics as a collection of isolated notions, the study proposes an integrated analytical framework in which contextual interpretation, speech acts, presupposition, implicature, deixis and communicative strategies interact in the production of political meaning. The research is theoretical and interpretive in design. It synthesizes positions represented in studies of pragmalinguistics, political discourse and pragmatic text analysis and applies them to recurrent communicative mechanisms of political speech. Particular attention is paid to the way political actors use illocutionary force, implicit meanings and deictic opposition to construct collective identities, legitimize positions, guide interpretation and influence audience response.

Keywords

political discourse
pragmatics
linguopragmatics
speech acts
presupposition
communicative strategy.

Authors

Gunay Tahmazova

Rubric:General questions of philology and linguistics
1
0

Share

1
0

References:

Abdugaffarova, G.A. (2019). The main areas of investigation of pragmalinguistics. Science and Education Today, 12(47), 42–43.

Babayeva, N. (2024). Conceptual models and translation problems in political discourse. Terminology Issues, (2), 52–57.

Beard, A. (2001). The language of politics. London, England: Routledge, Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Demyankov, V.Z. (2002). Political discourse as a subject of political philology. Political Science. Political Discourse: History and Modern Research, (3), 32–43.

Habibova, K. (2019). Sosiolinguistic analysis of political communication. Transcarpathian philological studios, 1(8), 149–154.

Habibova, K. (2025). The Manipulative Potential of Phraseological Units in Political Discourse (Based on the Twitter Posts of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev). Nakhchivan State University Scientific Works, (3), 40–47.

Malyuga, E., Shvets, A., & Tikhomirov, I. (2016). Computer-based analysis of business communication language. In Proceedings of the 2016 SAI Computing Conference, pp. 229–232.

Malyuga, E.N., & Popova, K.V. (2018). Linguopragmatics of speech strategies in social advertising. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University (Electronic Journal), (4), 231–241.

Mammadli, N., & Habibova, K. (2025). The interplay between academic communication and speech manipulation: A psychometric analysis. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S1), 29–37.

Zeynalov, E. (2024). Lexicon of international political discourse in British and American variants of English [PhD dissertation abstract]. Baku, Azerbaijan.

Other articles of the issue

Vusala Safarli Novruz LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL MEANS OF SPACE AND TIME
71 views
cc-license
About us Journals Books
Publication ethics Terms of use of services Privacy policy
Copyright 2013-2025 Premier Publishing s.r.o.
Praha 8 - Karlín, Lyčkovo nám. 508/7, PSČ 18600, Czech Republic pub@ppublishing.org