Decomposition of Monolithic Solutions in Corporate Procurement Platforms: Architectural Migration Strategies and Complexity Management
Authors
Roilian Mykyta
Share
Annotation
This article examines the process of decomposing monolithic information systems in corporate procurement platforms, with a focus on architectural migration strategies and the management of emerging complexity. The study analyzes principles for transitioning to modular architectures, including the use of facade layers, service isolation, and intermediary adapters that enable phased transformation without disruption of business processes. The importance of managing architectural and operational complexity in the adoption of distributed solutions is emphasized. Practical examples of applying architectural approaches under industrial operating conditions are presented. Typical risks associated with the transition are discussed, along with the potential long-term benefits of modular systems. Particular attention is given to resilience, scalability, and integration compatibility of the resulting architectures.
Keywords
Authors
Roilian Mykyta
Share
References:
Saucedo, A. M., Rodriguez, G., Rocha, F. G. and dos Santos, R. P. (2025) Migration of monolithic systems to microservices: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 177, 107590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107590
Katal, A., Prasanna, P. and Birla, R. (2025) Evolution from Monolithic to Microservices Architecture: A New Era in Software Architecture. In: Advancements in Optimization and Nature-Inspired Computing for Solutions in Contemporary Engineering Challenges. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 235-279.
Miloserdov, A. (2025) Intelligent automation of supply audit using machine learning in B2B SaaS platforms. Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies, 8(12), 7965-7970. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v8-i12-40
Berezhnoy, A. (2025) Architectural approaches to designing scalable information systems in e-commerce. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 14(6), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2025/011462025
Pittu, R. (2025) From Monoliths to Microservices: A Comprehensive Framework for Enterprise Cloud-Native Transformation. Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(7), 436-441.
Ogunwole, O., Onukwulu, E. C., Joel, M. O., Adaga, E. M. and Ibeh, A. I. (2023) Modernizing legacy systems: A scalable approach to next-generation data architectures and seamless integration. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(1), 901-909. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijmrge.2023.4.1.901-909
AWS (2026) Accelerating Migration at Scale Using AWS Application Migration Service with 3M Company. [cited: 20.01.2026]. Available from https://aws.amazon.com/ru/solutions/case-studies/3m-accelerating-migration-case-study
Korostin, O., Blazhkovskii, A., Tretiakov, I. and Stepanov, M. (2025) Artificial intelligence as a key to improving the efficiency of logistics operations. Transport Technician: Education and Practice, 6(2), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.46684/2687-1033.2025.2.188-195
Rusum, G. P. & Anasuri, S. (2023) Composable Enterprise Architecture: A New Paradigm for Modular Software Design. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, 4(1), 99-111.
Saari, T., Savolainen, K., Tyllinen, M., Viitanen, J. and Nieminen, M. (2024) Addressing Usability and Complexity in Procurement of IT Systems. Journal of User Experience, 20(1), 27–45.
Red Hat (2026) The state of application modernization. [cited: 22.01.2026]. Available from https://www.redhat.com/en/resources/app-modernization-report
CNCF Annual Survey (2024) Cloud Native 2024. [cited: 22.01.2026]. Available from https://www.cncf.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/cncf_annual_survey24_031225a.pdf
Grafana (2024) Observability Survey. [cited: 23.01.2026]. Available from https://grafana.com/media/observability-survey/Obs-Survey-24-final.pdf
Eldenk, D. & Çetin, H. A. (2025) Incidents During Microservice Decomposition: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE ’25), 805-808. https://doi.org/10.1145/3756681.3757005
Other articles of the issue
