Visual Transfers Across Asia: Chinese Motifs and the Synthesis of Timurid Ornamentation
Authors
Shakhlo Bakhrieva
Share
Annotation
This paper examines how visual models of Chinese origin entered the Timurid artistic system through fifteenth-century Silk Road exchanges and how they were subsequently redefined within the local artistic tradition. The scope centers on the major cultural centers of Herat and Samarkand, focusing on two media where these processes are particularly visible: miniature painting and blue-and-white underglaze ceramics. Rather than cataloguing isolated examples, the study addresses broader patterns of transformation while referring to specific cases where relevant. The research employs comparative visual and stylistic analysis to map compositional structures, trace families of motifs, and assess how material and technique influenced aesthetic decisions. Findings indicate that Chinese-derived elements were not passively copied but translated into the ornamental grammar of Timurid art and adapted to its visual logic. Over time, these external forms stabilized as hybrid configurations and became part of the internal order of Timurid ornamentation. The study concludes that individual artistic imports evolved into new stylistic norms through deliberate adaptation, offering a model for understanding intercultural artistic synthesis. The Timurid case, examined through the lenses of Herat and Samarkand, demonstrates how continuous cultural contact, material technology, and composition collectively shaped stylistic innovation and the emergence of a synthesized visual language across Chinese and Timurid art traditions.
Keywords
Authors
Shakhlo Bakhrieva
Share
References:
Carswell, J. (1985). Blue and white: Chinese porcelain and its impact on the Western world. The David & Alfred Smart Gallery.
Fan, C. (2023). The Timurid regions and Moghulistan through the eyes of a Ming diplomat. Journal of Asian Studies. Advance online publication.
Golombek, L., Mason, R., & Bailey, G. A. (1996). Tamerlane’s tableware: A new approach to the chinoiserie ceramics of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Iran. Mazda.
González de Clavijo, R. (1928). Embassy to Tamerlane, 1403–1406 (G. Le Strange, Trans.). Hakluyt Society.
Harrison-Hall, J. (2001). Ming ceramics in the British Museum. British Museum Press.
Homma, M. (2017). The influence of Chinese art on Persian paintings in the Ilkhanid and Timurid periods. Waseda RILAS Journal, 5, 241–260.
Komaroff, L., & Carboni, S. (Eds.). (2002). The legacy of Genghis Khan: Courtly art and culture in western Asia, 1256–1353. The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
Lentz, T. W., & Lowry, G. D. (1989). Timur and the princely vision: Persian art and culture in the fifteenth century. Los Angeles County Museum of Art; Smithsonian Institution.
Manz, B. F. (2007). Power, politics and religion in Timurid Iran. Cambridge University Press.
Medley, M. (1982). The Chinese potter: A practical history of Chinese ceramics (2nd ed.). Phaidon.
Rawson, J. (1984). Chinese ornament: The lotus and the dragon. British Museum Publications.
Rossabi, M. (1976). Two Ming envoys to Inner Asia. T’oung Pao, 62(1–3), 1–34.
Roxburgh, D. (2000). On the transmission of illustrated manuscripts in Timurid Iran. Muqarnas, 17, 119–146.
Shea, E. L. (2018). The Mongol cultural legacy in East and Central Asia: The early Ming and Timurid courts. Journal of Art Historiography, 19.
Subtelny, M. (2007). Timurids in transition: Turko-Persian politics and acculturation in medieval Iran. Brill.
Sugimura, T. (1992). Chinese influence on Persian paintings of the 14th–15th centuries. Senri Ethnological Studies, 32, 1–19.
Watson, O. (2004). Ceramics from Islamic lands. Thames & Hudson.Watson, O. (2004). Ceramics from Islamic Lands. London/New York: Thames & Hudson.
Other articles of the issue
