In the original languageTranslation into English
ABOUT THE MOST RECENT PROBLEMS OF LEXICOGRAPHY
Authors
Parvana Pashayeva Ismayil, Abbas Abbasov Gurban
Rubric:General questions of philology and linguistics
1475
2
Share
1475
2
Annotation
This article investigates the theoretical dimensions of digital technologies in reshaping modern lexicography, focusing on their capacity to create adaptive, virtual lexicographic frameworks. It proposes a novel conceptual model for standardizing linguistic resources across cognate languages, with a specific emphasis on the Turkic languages. By analyzing the interplay of normalization, terminological unification, and multilingual lexicography, the study advances a theoretical foundation for linguistic convergence, contributing to the broader discourse on language standardization and digital lexicographic innovation.
Keywords
information technologies
lexicographic means
word-term of course
orthography
rhetoric
language teaching methodology
Multiparametric city.
orthoepy
terminology
Authors
Parvana Pashayeva Ismayil, Abbas Abbasov Gurban
Rubric:General questions of philology and linguistics
1475
2
Share
1475
2
References:
- Akhundov A. (2003) Language and literature. Baku, Ganjlik, , page 660.
- Atkins Jr, L. C. R. L., Lamb, L. C. D. A., Barger, M. M. L., Adair, M. L. N., & Tiernan, M. M. J. (1996). 2025 In-Time Information Integration System (I 3 S).
- Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Lami, G., & Maccari, A. (2003). Applications of linguistic techniques for use case analysis. Requirements Engineering, 8, 161-170.
- Fuertes Olivera, Pedro A., and Ascensión Arribas-Baño. "Pedagogical specialised lexicography." (2008): 1-176.
- Gerd A.S. (1986) Fundamentals of scientific and technical lexicography. – Leningrad, LSU, – page 72.
- Gorodetsky B.Y. (1983) Problems and methods of modern lexicography // New in foreign linguistics. Publication 14. Moscow, Progress, Page 5-22
- Grenoble, Lenore A., and Nadezhda Ja Bulatova. "Language standardization in the aftermath of the Soviet language empire." Standardizing minority languages. Routledge, 2017. 118-134.
- Hjørland, B. (2023). Terminology. KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 50(2), 111-127.
- İskender, H. (2023). A Case of Unique Lexical Engineering: Deliberate Etymological Misrepresentation in Turkish Language Reform. Külliye, 4(2), 331-349.
- Jackson, Howard. Lexicography: an introduction. Routledge, 2013.
- Kornfilt, Jaklin. "Turkish and the Turkic languages." The world's major languages. Routledge, 2018. 536-561.
- Leichic V.M. (1996) Applied science of terminology and its directions // Applied philology - SPSU: SPU,. - Page. 276-286.
- Mahmudov M. (2013) Computer linguistics. Baku, “Science and Education”, page 356.
- May, S. (2014). Contesting public monolingualism and diglossia: Rethinking political theory and language policy for a multilingual world. Language policy, 13, 371-393.
- Ouhsousou, S., & Tonkal, Ö. (2024, September). Analysis of Global Language Dynamics: A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Most Spoken Languages and Perceived Learning Ease. In 2024 8th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
- Pavlenko, A. (2008). Multilingualism in post-Soviet countries: Language revival, language removal, and sociolinguistic theory. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, 11(3-4), 275-314.
- Pearsall, J. (2015). Historical principles sv. synchronic approaches. U International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography, ur. Patrick Hanks i Gilles-Maurice de Schryver, 1-14.
- Schryver, G. M. (2003). Lexicographers' dreams in the electronic‐dictionary age. International journal of lexicography, 16(2), 143-199.
- Swanepoel, P. (2006). 5 Dictionary typologies: A pragmatic approach. In A practical guide to lexicography (pp. 44-69). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Tarp, S., & Gouws, R. H. (2008). A lexicographic approach to language policy and recommendations for future dictionaries. Lexikos, 18(1), 232-255.
Other articles of the issue
