Intercultural conceptualization in creativity Gibran Khalil Gibran
Authors
Nuriyeva Nurana Majid gizi

Share
Annotation
As a Maronite Christian Arab, Gibran Khalil Gibran was influenced not only by his own religion, but also by Islam and especially by Sufi Sufism. Gibran Khalil, as a person, could not see himself as belonging to any place, the poet-philosopher, who was thrown into the American environment at the age of twelve, but could not tear himself away from the Arab world, eventually expressed his rich spiritual world, which combines the two worlds, the East and the West, with his religious-mystical views. The main theme of his world-famous English work "The Prophet" contains the spiritual power that human existence derives from Divine love. In Islam, Sufism or Sufism, which shows the source of Divine love, is a special teaching that determines the paths of spiritual development. Sufism, which is the result of the spiritual searches of a Muslim, also takes place in Gibran Khalil's creative work, becoming the result of his spiritual searches.
Keywords
Authors
Nuriyeva Nurana Majid gizi

Share
References:
- Bhabha, K. Homi. The Location of Culture, London & New York, 1994, 285 p.
- Bhabha, HK (2006). Cultural diversity and cultural differences. Of. In Ashcroft, B. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The Post-Colonial Studies Reader (pp. 155–157). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Bushrui, SB, & Jenkins, J. Kahlil Gibran, Man and Poet: A new biography. Oxford, England; Boston, MA: Oneworld Publications., 1998, p. 13
- Hossell, Karen Price, John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Speech. Heinemann-Raintree: 2005, 48 p.
- Hassan, Wail S. Immigrant Narratives. Orientalism and cultural translation in Arab American and Arab British literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. – 259 p.
- The Holy Quran, (Translated from Arabic by ZM Bunyadov and VM Mam)Adaliyev) "Olymp" concern. Baku, 1998, 652 p., p. 33
- Turner, Edith. "The Literary Roots of Victor Turner's Anthropology". In Kathleen M. Ashley (ed.). Victor Turner and the Construction of Cultural Criticism. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 1990, pp. 163–169
